In the summer 2019, someone posted a tweet suggesting that Peppa Pig, the young star of the long-running British animated children's TV series of the same name, is 7,1 feet tall which, converted in meters, is equal to 216 centimetres. Whether this is the result of chance or a conspiracy is not obvious to everyone because few people know the meaning of the value 216. When this information become public, the internet had quite a field day with it, though it is unclear whether or not it is true. The reports that this young animated pig is over 7 feet tall began after one viral tweet. July 20 2019, Twitter user @Memeulous posted a screenshot from what appears to be a simple Google search. In it, Peppa's height was revealed to be an astounding and "terrifying" 7'1". Of course, Peppa Pig's height has not been confirmed and we don't know that this young, animated star is really this tall. The magazine INSIDER reached out to Entertainment One, the company that currently owns "Peppa Pig," for comment but has not immediately heard back. Regardless, this new bit of information has resulted in a flurry of memes and jokes. Some also realized that if we are to believe Peppa Pig is this tall, she would be the same height as NBA superstar Shaquille O'Neal and scouts should take notice. In reality, 216 represents the 216-digits matrix and is a value that has many properties that explains the nature of time and the human being, as can be understood by consulting the 216-digits.com website. In particular, from the analysis of the matrix, a numerical singularity is evident which will occur coinciding with the year 2028AD. The fact that children under the age of 5 become familiar with the value 216 associating it with the height of Peppa Pig is a very original idea that could draw the attention of adults to the period we are experiencing and its meaning in history.

The period between the years 1972 and 2028 is linked to the number 216 inseparably. A few nights ago in 2014 I asked myself if there was a correlation between the year of my birth, the year that according to my research corresponds to the Event Horizon on Earth, and the legendary number 216. The equation that I found, including a summation of y years, it is very simple and has two unknowns: b, which stands for year of birth and t, indicating the year of collective transmutation. The only possible result in the current period, that is, for an individual in life right now, is that he was born in 1972 and that the final collective transmutation takes place in the year 2028. The answer was yes and it was quite exciting! Are we living in the final countdown?

Apocalypse means Revelation, Destruction or Accomplishment. "In the history of the world, the foundation of a city and the birth of a human being have a metaphysical meaning. Thus, for about 2000 years, the foundation of the "eternal" city and the birth of Jesus Christ have been linked by the same history, in a sort of parallelism of the measurement of time, through the diffusion of the religious doctrine for which they had been reached and overcome 264 successors after he who founded his Church on the stone. Jesus Christ, the man who more than any other has marked the course of time, and Rome, the city that has implicitly lived all the contradictions of matter and spirit have a strongly linked past, which still lives in the present. The Latin system considered the calculation of the years since the foundation of Rome. This was fixed at the traditional date of April 21st 753 before Christ. It seems that Pope Boniface IV was the first to recognize the connection between the era of Ab Urbe Condita, calculated from the foundation of the city and from the Anno Domini era, calculated from the coming of Jesus Christ. The calculations underlying the Anno Domini system were previously developed by a monk called Dionigi Il Piccolo, as a result of his work on the calculation of Easter by Pope John I. According to his calculations, the incarnation of Jesus Christ took place in the year 753 from the foundation of Rome. This year was therefore adopted as the year 1 after Christ on the Julian calendar. In later times, the Gregorian calendar became the official calendar of the Western world, taking the name of Pope Gregory XIII. It's a solar calendar, based on the cycle of the seasons. The year consists of 12 months of different durations for a total of 365 or 366 days. The Gregorian calendar thus continues the numbering of the years of Julian. The dating system according to the Anno Domini is currently dominant in most countries of the world. It has become the reference standard, approved by all world organizations. An elegant coincidence means that the year 969 Ab Urbe Condita corresponds to the year Domini 216. The difference between these two years reversed on themselves with respect to the horizontal plane gives 912 minus 696, still 216. If a medal presents the same identical representation of the two sides to the observer, it means that it represents at the same time two same crosses or two same heads: the Christian cross, symbol of the passion, whose use appears in 264 BC, at the time of the wars Punic, and dell'ankh, the Egyptian symbol representing the cycles of life, are the most widespread; the head, the identifying symbol of a man and his intelligence, the representation of his conscience. Life, normally welded by the same soul to consciousness, thus becomes, in a certain moment, through an unprecedented mathematical representation, the emblem of the double opposition of life and knowledge in the course of history. A moment that recalls the universal spirit of the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, symbol of knowledge, which according to the Bible were situated in the garden of Eden, where Adam and Eve were created by God. Around this bipolarity, an inexorable count in the history of the world accompanies the periods of oscillation of humanity around a center, from a Genesis and up to an expected time, that of the end of time ". From the introduction of the unpublished book L'Homme de l'Apocalypse, Massimo Nardotto, 2012. Recalls: 1. 216: The number of digits that make up the 216-digits matrix, also known as Nardotto Sequence in a protected American site, where according to some sources the truth about the nature of time and man is condensed. 2. 969 has the meaning of King, since in the French alphabet, the original language in which the work of The Man of the Apocalypse was initially realized in the period of residence of the author in Paris, the Gematria in T9 gives the word ROI. 3. 264, squared gives the value of the tree of knowledge, in the value of 69696, the largest palindrome number known to mankind, to be at the same time the sum of two twin primes and a square of a number, 264 for 'precisely. 4. 696 minus 612 gives the value 84 which represents the value of Massimo Nardotto, as well as Napoleon Bonapart in the T9 Gematria. 5. 84 is the oscillatory value of (x + y) in the fundamental equation of time π (x + y) (t - xy) = 69696 where π has the value of the approximation calculated by Archimedes from Syracuse, considering an inscribed polygon in the circle having a number of sides equal to a revolution angle expressed in degrees minus the value 264. 6. 612 is the result of 4 times 153, the number of large fish caught by Jesus Christ appeared to some apostles, throwing the nets to the right of the boat, and a mirror image of 216, at the end of the New Testament written by John. 7. 2028AD is the temporal singularity represented by the analysis of the 216-digits matrix as well as the vertex of the parabola represented by the equation of time. 8. 2012AD is the year in which (xy) in the equation of time has the value 8, representing the entry in the apocalyptic period we are living, so the oscillatory difference between x and y in the time equation is less than 9, the number of figures in nature. 9. Massimo Nardotto in T9 gematria has the values ​​of 38 and 46, which represent x and y in the time equation when t is equal to 2012.

We just entered a fundamental new epoch in computing. Maybe. Google scientists said we did. Then their declaration mysteriously vanished. Last week, a scientific paper by Google and affiliated researchers was uploaded on a NASA website. Its contents – if legitimate – are not insignificant. In the paper, the scientists claim that quantum processors have "reached the regime of quantum supremacy". That's a hugely important claim, if it's true; a pivotal milestone in quantum computing, ushering in a sort of regime change in the era of computer science. But before we get too ahead of ourselves – and explain specifically why this is a big deal – a brief disclaimer: the reason we can't be sure of the paper's legitimacy is that shortly after the research article was uploaded, it was withdrawn for reasons unknown. The news was originally broken by the Financial Times, which reported both seeing the paper and also that it was subsequently taken down. (The internet being the internet, though, numerous insta-copies were made before the puzzling deletion, and are now freely available to read online.) Despite the appearance, disappearance, and reappearance of this provocative paper, Google has not officially explained to anybody what's going on, sparking no end of speculation online about what has or hasn't happened. In that sense, it's a little bit like a mini quantum paradox in itself. Assuming the paper is for real, though – what is quantum supremacy, and why is this important? Despite the incredible promise of quantum computers, their potential remains largely theoretical, even to this day. Hypothetically speaking, though, in the future, it's predicted that quantum computers will be able to solve problems that are beyond the reach of the classical computers we use today. Passing such a threshold will be considered proof of 'quantum supremacy'. "Demonstrating quantum supremacy – that is, demonstrating a quantum computation that cannot be performed on any conventional computer, even the world's best supercomputer – will be a key milestone in demonstrating that quantum computers have the potential to be very powerful, and hopefully very useful," quantum information theorist Stephen Bartlett told ScienceAlert. Bartlett, who teaches courses in quantum physics and quantum computing at the University of Sydney, isn't involved with Google's quantum research team, and wouldn't comment on the seemingly leaked paper – which may not be finished research, he noted. But Bartlett did say the research community was anticipating a Google announcement on this in the very near future. "It is widely believed that quantum supremacy is 'within reach' of the latest generation of quantum devices being built, by Google as well as other companies and universities," Bartlett said. "Google has been quite vocal publicly in their goals to achieve quantum supremacy." That vocal stance has hit a whole new level, if the purported research paper is to be believed. In the paper, the authors claim to have developed an experimental quantum processor called 'Sycamore', which has 53 functional qubits and takes about 200 seconds to solve a particular computational problem. As part of the experiment, a state-of-the-art supercomputer required approximately 10,000 years to perform the same task. "This dramatic speedup relative to all known classical algorithms provides an experimental realisation of quantum supremacy on a computational task and heralds the advent of a much-anticipated computing paradigm," the authors write. "To our knowledge, this experiment marks the first computation that can only be performed on a quantum processor. Quantum processors have thus reached the regime of quantum supremacy." Again, we can't be entirely sure of the paper's veracity, and even if the research is real (which it certainly looks to be), it may not have yet undergone the necessary peer review to substantiate these kinds of claims. If the claims prove to be true, Bartlett says there may be broader questions of whether demonstrations like this of quantum supremacy, along the lines of what Google has long been advocating, are really the final word. "While we believe that some quantum computations will be out of reach of any conventional computer, it is a challenge to argue that any particular set of processes cannot be simulated through some suitable trick," Bartlett told ScienceAlert. "I suspect that the first claims of quantum supremacy will be followed by a lengthy period of contention, where scientists push the limits of conventional supercomputers to find a way to simulate these claimed demonstrations." In other words, figuring out ways to rigorously test quantum supremacy could be a supreme challenge in itself. And even when we objectively pass the quantum supremacy threshold, it may take a long time for quantum computers to become as useful to people as conventional computers, especially since quantum computers have significant technological hurdles that need to be refined. For quantum computing researcher Steven Flammia, also from the University of Sydney, ongoing improvements in the areas of quantum error correction and fault tolerance are just as important, if not more important, than theoretical attempts to reach supremacy. "In my mind, those are sort of more significant than this initial quantum supremacy announcement," Flammia told ScienceAlert. "Once you can achieve error correction and fault tolerance, there's a very strong theoretical reason to believe that there are no 'in principle' obstacles to scaling up large scale useful quantum computation." When these technologies mature, and quantum supremacy is assured, Bartlett says quantum computers should be able to solve a wide range of problems that are fundamental to modern life. "Key areas of interest include drug design, developing new high-tech materials, and big implications for information security," Bartlett says. Within five years, even, it's possible quantum computers will be making meaningful strides in areas of academic research, Flammia thinks, adding that the emerging computational abilities could start helping us to design things like high-temperature superconductors, or better understand the process of nitrogen fixation. "Those baby steps could be useful to us academics within five years," Flammia says. "I think it's decades before, you know, you're logging into a quantum laptop." Cautious timeframes and expectations seem entirely reasonable, but in a world where quantum supremacy may have already dawned (watch this space…), who knows what the limits are? "With devices that are quantum supreme," Bartlett says, "I think we will see the rise of a new generation of quantum-savvy coders and hackers who find applications of quantum computers everywhere."

ALL Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) are illegal. Israel’s long-running policy of settling civilians in occupied territory amounts to a war crime.[1] This needs to be clearly said now, without ambiguity. The United States government, as sponsor of the current ‘peace talks’ between Israel and Palestinians, must uphold rule of law and human rights. Despite the fact that the U.S. has historically taken the same position as the international community that Israeli settlements within the OPT are illegal, they have chosen to prevaricate in recent years, using words like ‘unhelpful’ or ‘illegitimate’ to describe settlement building by Israel. This does favors for no one. Not the United States, not Palestinians, and not Israel. [pullquote text=”Israel’s long-running policy of settling civilians in occupied territory is considered a war crime under the statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC).”]This equivocation does, however, help sustain the cycle of violence and perpetuate further violations of international humanitarian and human rights law. The West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip all remain under effective control of the Israeli government. The legal obligations for any occupying power are outlined in international humanitarian law (IHL), particularly the Fourth Geneva Convention. Palestinians living in the OPT are considered protected persons under the convention, which Israel has ratified. IHL stipulates states are not to transfer their own civilians into territory they occupy, or to forcibly transfer protected persons from or within an occupied territory. States are also forbidden from destroying individual or collective property in an occupied territory, except when this is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations. Under Israeli law, settlements ‘authorized’ by the government are legal while smaller, ‘unofficial’ outposts are illegal. Sometimes the Israeli government retroactively ‘legalizes’ previously unauthorized outposts. International law does not make any such distinctions; all Israeli settlements in the OPT violate the Fourth Geneva Convention. The international community has consistently recognized that settlements contravene international law and create a situation which perpetuates a range of violations of Palestinian human rights including, but not limited to, discriminatory policies based on nationality, ethnicity and religion. The United Nations Fact Finding Mission (FFM) on Israeli Settlements found “a multitude of the human rights of the Palestinians are violated in various forms and ways due to the existence of the settlements” and “Israel is committing serious breaches of its obligations under the right to self-determination and under humanitarian law.” The chair of the FFM, Ms. Christine Chanet said, “In compliance with Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention Israel must cease all settlement activities without preconditions.” In order for the United States government to respect the rule of law during these ‘peace talks’ and truly facilitate a just and sustainable peace in the region, they must insist Israel immediately halt all construction of settlements and related infrastructure as a first step towards removing all settlers from the OPT. [1] Israel’s long-running policy of settling civilians in occupied territory is considered a war crime under the statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Article 8(2) of the Rome Statute defines “the transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies, or the deportation or transfer of all or parts of the population of the occupied territory within or outside this territory” as a war crime when committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes.

"It’s time to vote with our feet and send a clear message to the world that we truly believe that the Temple Mount is ours and we truly hope and pray for the rebuilding of the Third Temple."

Laudato si' is the second encyclical of Pope Francis. The encyclical has the subtitle "on care for our common home". In it, the pope critiques consumerism and irresponsible development, laments environmental degradation and global warming, and calls all people of the world to take "swift and unified global action.” In the fifth chapter, Bergoglio offers some guidelines for guidance and action. Not only a complaint, but it raises the question of what can be done to "get out of the spiral of self-destruction in which we are sinking". The Church does not pretend to define scientific questions, nor to replace politics, but the Pope calls for an "honest and transparent debate, because particular needs or ideologies do not harm the common good". The judgment is severe: "The world summits on the environment in recent years have not responded to expectations because, due to lack of political decision, they have not reached really significant and effective global environmental agreements". The Pope asks "why do we want to maintain a power today that will be remembered for its inability to intervene when it was urgent and necessary to do so?" We need a world ruler: "we need an agreement on governance (administrative) regimes for the whole range of so-called global common goods", since "environmental protection cannot be assured only on the basis of the financial calculation of costs and benefits . The environment is one of those assets that the mechanisms of the market are not able to defend or adequately promote ", he writes repeating the words of the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church - is a book edited by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace for gather and systematize the Catholic teaching on social doctrine. Also in this chapter, Pope Francis insists on the development of honest and transparent decision-making processes, in order to "discern" which entrepreneurial policies and initiatives will lead to "a true integral development". In particular, the study of the environmental impact of a new project “requires transparent political processes and subjected to dialogue, while the corruption that hides the true environmental impact of a project in exchange for favors often leads to ambiguous agreements that escape the duty to inform and in-depth debate ". Particularly incisive is the appeal addressed to those who cover political offices, so as to avoid "the logic of efficiency and immediatist" "today dominant:" if he has the courage to do so, he will be able to recognize again the dignity that God has given him as a person and will leave, after his passage in this story, a testimony of generous responsibility. Finally, the sixth chapter, Education and ecological spirituality, because "every change needs motivation and an educational journey". All educational fields are involved, first and foremost "school, family, media, catechesis". The starting point is "to focus on another lifestyle", which also opens up the possibility of "exercising healthy pressure on those who hold political, economic and social power". What happens when consumer choices manage to "change the behavior of companies, forcing them to consider the environmental impact and production models". We cannot underestimate the importance of environmental education pathways capable of affecting daily gestures and habits, from the reduction of water consumption, to the separate collection of waste to "turn off unnecessary lights". All this brings to light the very pragmatic concepts embraced by Last Day Party: 1. The need for global governance. 2. The use of tools and organizations that allow smarter decision-making processes. 3. The responsibility of the leaders. 4. Education to spread best practices.

Is the Earthquake that struck Amatrice on 24th August 2016 correlated with the 216-digits matrix? In 2009, during the shooting of my film The Man of the Apocalypse, I shot a sequence, not published in the movie, in the terrace of my office, as long as I was writing the matrix of 216-digits, in front of an open yard, from which they could hear the noise of excavators. In 2011 I published the video a few days on YouTube, entitling it "Earthquake, spread the first numerical earthquake in the history", totalizing only 4 visitors. On August 24th, 2016 a 6.0 magnitude earthquake struck Amatrice, an Italian town in the province of Rieti, with a first quake, which was also the most violent, at 3:36 am, with its epicenter in Accumoli, 4 km depth. The word Amatrice means Amateur, but it could also mean A-Matrix. What is unique is that the 3:36 in the morning correspond to 216 minutes after midnight, by remembering the 216-digits matrix. From a statistical analysis of visitors to the site 216-digits.com, it appears an inexplicable circumstance between 23 and 24 August 2016, in which there was a peak of 6,000 visitors when, on average, connections to the site does not exceed 30 (see image on the section Additional Documents). This morning (24th August 2019), when I woke up, I turned on my smartphone to check the time. It was precisely 6:12 am, which symbolizes 216 through a mirror. The digital philosophy, the physics of time and the nature of numbers confirm that the events that concern humanity are connected with the Whole.

For at least two centuries, the political battle in most democracies has been between conservatives and progressives. In particular, between those who want to maintain the status quo and those who want to question it; those who favour stability and those who want to shake up the status quo established by previous generations. Naturally, these distinctions are full of nuances in different countries, considering the different history, mentality, geopolitical situation and social divisions of each country. Today, this divide has become even more complex: should we make a distinction, among the conservatives, the people who want to protect nature? Should the people who want to encourage and accept all types of technological and industrial innovations be considered as supporters of change? It could lead to classifying ecological parties on the right-wing and the supporters of the liberal economy on the left-wing. Should those who support defending rural territories really be classified on the right-wing? And the defenders of big cities on the left-wing? Should the people who defend the national identity cause necessarily be classified on the right-wing and those who want a more open world on the left-wing? Is secularism, which is at the heart of French identity, not left-wing quest? And is not openness to the world an idea of the proponents of the market economy, which should rather be classified on the right-wing? Finally, is an authoritarian government necessarily more right-wing than left-wing? It is clear that these concepts are evolving, the analytical grids are converging, new struggles are emerging, which do not overlap with the old ones. And it is increasingly difficult to reduce the political debate to two simple camps: there are conservatives and modernists on both the right-wing and the left-wing. The policy evolutions have allowed some people to say that the left-right political spectrum divide is dead. Does that mean we have to give up on it? And to think that today's struggle is in fact between progressives and conservatives, between those who defend the homeland and those who favour mobility. The distinction between "open" and "closed" is certainly becoming more and more important. Those who advocate for closure are those who defend an identity, a territory, and a cultural and natural heritage. If we were to follow this criterion, it should lead us to see the emerging coalition between the far right and the ecologists, which does not actually exist almost anywhere. It is therefore not a relevant divide. Because in reality, we cannot defend the environment by closing ourselves off: the climate has no borders; and it is not, for example, because we improve the situation of forests in one country that the situation of the world's forests will not worsen. Those who advocate for openness are those who defend receiving goods and people from elsewhere, in exchange for the individual right to mobility. If we were to follow this criterion, we should see an alliance between those who defend the right to receive migrants and those who favour free trade. But this is not an actual thing. Thus, I do not think the distinction between conservatives and progressives, or between closed and open is still relevant. Or that the left-right divide wing is a thing of the past. It has taken new forms. Never have inequalities in income, wealth, hope and social mobility been so high. Never has the fight for more social justice been more justified. Justice related to individuals, generations, social groups, and territories. And it is this struggle that brings together those who want to defend the weakest wherever they are, in factories, territories, abroad, or in future generations. To bring these various concepts together and to find out where the new divide is leading us, it seems to me that we need to make a new distinction between those who think that we should only take care of ourselves and those who believe the best way to take care of ourselves is to take care of others. Between selfishness and altruism. Both perfectly respectable. Both favouring different values. Yet both can turn into unbearable caricatures. Of course, there may be times when necessary reforms that are neither left or right on the policy spectrum, but are objectively useful to everyone, are delayed for too long by pusillanimous leaders, and lead to putting aside for a time the distinction between left-wing and right-wing. But this can only last for a period of time. Altruism will prevail if it can convince us that it is also the most intelligent and effective form of selfishness; and that, for example, it is by helping rural areas that we will best defend urban areas; that it is by helping African development that we will best protect the interests of Europeans, and that it is by defending future generations that we will best prepare our own future.

Worried to see the European civilization wither away, as a historian, I give my thoughts and personal advice in What to do? Living with the decline of Europe, a survival guide for lovers of the West. My book What to do? Living with the decline of Europe is more personal testimony than political essay. This is the reason why I wanted to share these intimate reflections.

The terrifying accident at the Russian weapons and ammunition warehouse in Achinsk, Russia, not far from Krasnoyarsk, is a grating metaphor of what is happening around the world. And, it is still perfectly avoidable: the accumulation of ammunition and weapons, in hazardous security conditions, near a city of more than 100,000 inhabitants, ended up producing an explosion equivalent to that of 40,000 shells. Looking at the world, it appears that something similar is being prepared, on a completely different scale: in a senseless typical junkyard manner, we are accumulating many flammable materials without any precaution, all of which can trigger a global upheaval: Beijing can shoot at Hong Kong demonstrators, which would lead to a violent reaction from the Americans and China's neighbours; North Korea's production of nuclear weapons and launchers will eventually lead to a reaction from South Korea and Japan, who will also want these weapons as well; which will push Iran to go much further in enriching its uranium. Similarly, the catastrophic destruction of one of the world's last primary forests vital for humanity in Brazil, and similarly senseless accumulation of waste in the oceans, are other examples of the suicide of every man for himself. In addition, there are the threats of the United States’ trade war against China, Germany or France; the imminent exit of Great Britain from the European Union without an agreement; and above all, the world's financial situation is getting more volatile every day and is only being maintained by a slow spoliation of savers, which will not be sufficient to finance the demands of the richest for long. All this leads to an accumulation of contradictions that will soon be unbearable: the more the wealthy classes plunder the middle classes, the more populism will rise; the more the poor classes emerge from their misery without changing their way of life, the more the environment will be looted and massacred. All of this is absolutely untenable. And it is the expression of a carefree attitude on the part of everyone, mostly concerned about their own interests, without wanting to consider the global consequences of their actions. And, with leaders and the global elites convinced that what has made the west happy since the end of the Second World War can make the whole planet happy tomorrow—deadly illusions. In these circumstances, someone will soon have an interest in lighting the fuse, to divert attention from their own turpitudes, or to try to take advantage of a crisis to impose themselves on their rivals. And everything will explode, into a crisis much more serious than the previous one, because it will be financial, commercial, environmental and military.

The expo starts from my beginnings: the lions. They are the ones who taught me the picture. I was a kid very 'little con': I lied, flew. I was fired from schools. Yet everyone has a chance that passes. I was not afraid of my luck. As I had nothing, no diploma, I agreed to sweep the Boulogne film studio where I met actors, directors. After a year, I did a movie or two as an actor but I was bad, I did not work. Everything rocks when I fall in love with the mother of my best friend who then takes me to the Allier. She makes me discover her love of animals and we create a zoological reserve, at the beginning, with deer, wild boars etc. then, little by little, we raised tigers, lions. When I left at 30, I wanted to become a scientist. I went to Kenya with my wife today to prepare a thesis on the behavior of lions in Kenya. I realize then that the photos give information that does not give the writing. I start to learn patience. At the same time, I become a hot-air balloon pilot. I discovered aerial photography. When I started to photograph, I learned to look at beauty. What is more beautiful than a large oak in a field? What is more beautiful than a storm? This beauty crushes everything. Then the talk about the beauty of the planet changed in speech about the urgency to save what can still be. The success of "The Earth comes from the sky" comes from there: the beauty is around us, one is not even more aware of it. I have no great merit. My only quality is to make every effort for my work. I mortgaged my house for the project "Earth from the sky". When you work on something, you are inhabited by a certainty about what you do. It may be a little pretentious. But when you have the right subject, everyone is a good photographer. And then, I always thought that my photos did not belong to me. Earth is a common good. This is also why all the photos will be sold for the benefit of my foundation and everything is offset carbon. I dreamed of having a place where we could talk about ecology, awareness, raising people's awareness of the environment through free exhibitions, cooking classes, an outdoor course. We now have a giant hive too. To have in Paris three hectares and a castle to do it, it is the dream. The GoodPlanet Foundation does not stop there and is full of projects around the world. Since I'm 20, I'm interested in the environment. It was not the same look as today. We were interested in biodiversity: rhinos, elephants, birds. Today, we talk about global danger for all life on Earth. Scientists are now talking about the sixth extinction. Our values and our way of life are similar to the society consumer society in which we live. And finally, this religion of growth is killing life on Earth. What we could do at $ 2 billion, we can not do it at $ 7 billion. The population has been multiplied by 4 and the consumption of meat and fish by 8. We are consuming the Earth. It's been a decade that we really realize all this. I am an optimist very worried. We go to an unknown world, not everyone will die but it's a more complicated world, more cyclones, storms, an unbalanced world. What is terrible is that life on earth next to us is disappearing: wild animals only represent 2% of the world's biomass. There is more than us on Earth. And today, it's ridiculous to think that we can stop the machine. We must not think that it is useless to act, all our actions in favor of the planet amortize, we must continue to fight. You can eat organic, live in the countryside, stop buying industrial meat. It's simple.It will not change the world but allows to be in harmony with oneself. But acting makes you happy. Politicians lack courage. They are either unconscious or so obsessed with their electoral vision that they do not see what is happening. I imagine all the files that pile up on the desk of Emmanuel Macron whereas this subject should exceed all the others. The agreement of COP 21? What a fake stuff. The words oil, fossil energy and coal are absent, otherwise the producing countries did not sign. The problem is the egoism of everyone, nations. Everyone does what he wants. It would take a world government.